Having
read Barbara Willard's very fun Snail books, which I mentioned briefly in my
Furrowed Middlebrow Dozen post at the New Year, I became curious about her
novels for adults. She wrote more than a dozen adult novels from the 1930s to
1950s, before turning her attention for most of the rest of her career to
children's books, in which realm she became by far best known for her
historical Mantlemass series (1970-1992), which follows one family through more
than two centuries of English history.
Willard's
adult novels seem to gravitate toward the theatre world, which is not
surprising since, according to her Wikipedia page, she was "the daughter
of the Shakespearean actor Edmund Willard and the great-niece of Victorian era
actor Edward Smith Willard." I wouldn't know either of those actors if
they stood up in my soup, but suffice it to say Willard's knowledge of actors
and the theatre comes through in Echo
Answers and adds an extra interest to its story.
We
meet Sarah Philmore, a young woman whose lover was lost in the war, at the
wedding of another ex-flame to another woman. She is, clearly, unlucky in love.
At the wedding, she runs into an old friend, a war widow herself, and
spontaneously agrees to fill in for her for six months as secretary to Arnold
Chater, a bestselling novelist quickly moving past his prime. As part of her
role, she moves in with Chater and his family—kind, unflappable Elsa, his wife;
Elsa's mother, Dame Lucia Peverell, a famous retired actress; son Barney, who
has written a play with all the artistic integrity Arnold himself sold out long
ago; and daughter Rosalind, who has decided to be an actress as much to gain
Lucia's love as out of any calling.
Sarah
becomes enmeshed with the family's problems, and when her friend returns sooner
than expected to take back her job, she is at a loss. She begins an affair with
Barney, whose play, about a girl he loved who died, is about to be produced.
She is attracted to him largely because he reminds her of her lover lost in the
war, but this "echo" is in turn overshadowed by Barney's own, when
his play's lead is perfectly cast with a young actress who reminds him vividly of
the past. Rather interestingly, this also casts a shadow back over Sarah's earlier
love affair, as she wonders if that lover, too, would have become similarly
distracted with time.
It's
a very pleasant and enjoyable little melodrama with bits of humor scattered throughout and with interesting, life-like
characters and enough literary and theatrical glamour to keep things moving
along nicely. It lacks the cheerful joie-de-vivre of the Snail books, and
there's a bit too much emotional navel-gazing here and there for my taste, but what
makes up for this are some very striking passages that show Williard to be a
sophisticated observer of human nature. For instance, I'll always remember this
observation when the circumstance arises:
She ran up the steps and stood shaking
herself just inside the door, while an elderly woman crossing the hall paused
to watch her with disapproval and just that shade of contempt the dry have for
the wet.
I
had never thought of it before, but isn't this precisely how dry people do look at wet people?
There
are also enough poignant references to the war years to validate this novel's
inclusion on my WWII list in the Postwar section. Here is Sarah recalling her
wartime love, and the unique pain that must have been experienced by many women
with no socially or legally "legitimate" standing with a man:
No one had known that she and Tim were lovers and she had
heard of his death at second-hand. She had gone home for a twenty-four-hour leave
and been told by a friend met outside the station of the latest loss in the
neighbourhood. He was mourned by his family and there was no suggestion of any
other claim. Well, there was nothing very distinctive about that; unofficial
widowhood could hardly have been more common. But of all the wretchedness of
bereavement there was probably none more poignant, more difficult of acceptance,
than this secret grief that could never be displayed…
And
here is Willard somewhat evoking Barbara Noble's The House Opposite in her description of the undramatic reaction to
bombs:
She looked round the little theatre and remembered the
ambitious, not quite intelligible poetic drama she had seen here with Tim
during one of his leaves. In the middle of the performance there had been an
air raid; no one had taken any notice. It all seemed a very long time ago, but the
subject of Barney's play linked the two periods with a firm insistence that was
almost frightening. How did we manage, she wondered for the hundredth time; how
did we manage to live at all with the bombs falling and that incessant threat hanging over us, the perpetual uncertainty whether
we would see the morning? She smiled to herself. That undramatic acceptance of
drama seemed almost melodramatic now.
But
one of my favorite passages here has nothing to do with the war, but rather
with the theatre, and demonstrates Willard's personal knowledge of theatrical
life. Julie, Barney's leading lady, has retreated to her home following a
conflict and is threatening not to appear on opening night. Dame Lucia takes
matters into her own hands to save Barney's production and the talking-to she
gives Julie is a classic of "show must go on" philosophy:
"I don't know what Barney's done
to you," she said, "and frankly I don't care. But if he had spat in
your face and insulted you at the moment you were making your entrance, if he
had broken your heart and laughed at doing it, you should still be able to go
on to the stage and play your scene, and play it with all the power and the
feeling in you, right to the end, to the last word, to the final gesture, tears
or laughter, death or life, as it was written."
Julie swung on her heel with a sharp,
shrill laugh.
"It sounds very impressive."
"It is very impressive,"
Lucia said.
This sounds intriguing. I love the Mantlemass books (although at least one is so tragic I could never bring myself to reread it) and that resulted in my collecting most of her juvenile books. The Snail books did not make as much of an impression on me as on you - I prefer the two books about the Tower family and one called The Battle of Wednesday Week (step-sibling theme) - but her ability to convey a scene and characters with a few well chosen words is amazing. In the second Mantlemass book, the main character who is an orphan, is taken to meet a mysterious gentleman, slowly revealed to be Richard III on the night before the battle of Bosworth Field. For this boy to meet and lose his father in just a few moments is chilling. It is really a haunting series.
ReplyDeleteLovely, thanks for the recommendations and for making me want to read the Mantlemass books too!
DeleteThat's so interesting, I hadn't realised she'd written books for adults at all!
ReplyDeleteYes, and writing this review seems to have inspired me to request a few more of them. Despite some shortcomings, this one has stayed with me in a way that some books don't.
DeleteThe Mantlemass books are highly recommended. I loved them when young and still re-read every few years. They show how key historic moments reflect in ordinary people's lives. Also The Grove of Green Holly is not part of the series but has similarities.
ReplyDelete