And now for something completely different from Miss Read...
Back in February, the Neglected Books site featured a review of P. B. Abercrombie's sixth novel, Fido Couchant (1962), an author neither the reviewer nor myself had ever heard of before, though she apparently received considerable acclaim in her day for the eight novels she published between 1952 and 1972, including from the likes of John Betjeman, Marghanita Laski, and Angus Wilson, the last of whom called her "the most interesting of our young novelists."
Back in February, the Neglected Books site featured a review of P. B. Abercrombie's sixth novel, Fido Couchant (1962), an author neither the reviewer nor myself had ever heard of before, though she apparently received considerable acclaim in her day for the eight novels she published between 1952 and 1972, including from the likes of John Betjeman, Marghanita Laski, and Angus Wilson, the last of whom called her "the most interesting of our young novelists."
Abercrombie was, it turns
out, born in 1917, and lived until 2003, though her work appears to have been
forgotten long before that. Her pen name, interestingly, reverses her maiden and
married names. She was born Abercrombie and in 1938 married Denis Barnes, a
civil servant who was knighted in 1967. She's not yet even on my British
authors list, though of course she will be added in my next update.
I'm grateful to two different
readers of this blog—Mark Harris and Jeb Nichols—who emailed me to mention the Neglected Books post. I immediately
checked Worldcat and was delighted to find that most of Abercrombie's novels
are available to me one way or another. I more or less randomly selected one of
them to request first, and apparently made a good choice, since not only does The Little Difference seem to have been
her most successful work, but it also belongs on my Grownup School Story List,
which makes it an excellent place for me to have started. I didn't do any
digging for information about Abercrombie until after I'd read the book, but
Abercrombie's Wikipedia page quotes a review of Difference from The Tatler
which called it, "As enjoyable as a glass of champagne in the middle of a
sunny morning when you ought to be working." I don't typically drink
champagne at mid-morning, but in this case an exception is called for…
The novel follows the
experiences of Vivian Mudge, an independent-minded, sexually liberated
Londoner, during the year after she—perhaps misguidedly—accepts a teaching
position in a girls' boarding school in Cheshire. But don't get the idea that
the novel therefore belongs next to Mabel Esther Allan's Here We Go Round or Miss Read's Fresh
from the Country. This is an entirely different cup of tea—edgy, jaded, and
very, very funny—contrasting the glamorous Vivian with the more provincial
women around her, including the two headmistresses and an array of eccentric
mistresses, not to mention the goodlooking farmer nearby whom she commandeers
to help her teach cricket to the girls (among other things).
You know you're in for an
unusual reading experience with the very first paragraph, in which the school's
cranky music teacher trails Vivian, whom he has not yet met, on her first
arrival at the school, grumbling misogynistically all along the road:
An angry
old man had followed an unknown young woman for more than two miles before he
began to be specific in his strictures on her character. Then, when she
abruptly turned off the main road, with a gesture whose arrogance was clearly
characteristic, he began to analyse in detail a person he had until then simply
accused of being female. When first he caught sight of the bare brown elbow
resting on the opened window, his thoughts might have been simplified into the exclamation,
"Women!" which exacerbated the emotions he always felt at certain
mannerisms of driving. When the arm moved and raised itself to lightly clasp
the roof—like a woman holding a hat on in a wind—his rage at this most irritating
of motoring affectations was mingled with a dark suspicion; "Lesbian!"
he muttered aloud. The gold bracelet she wore slid down from wrist to forearm.
He watched it move again when, a little later, she slowed down; he could not
accuse her of not making signals, but in some mysterious way she had as she did
so the air of somebody giving orders. Besides, the flashes of that ostentatious
bracelet constituted, he believed, a danger on the road.
It's an appropriate opening,
because in many ways Abercrombie's novel is about just how much hostility and
resistance there is against women who are independent and unvulnerable, who
take life, men, love, and sex lightly. To some extent, Vivian is more the sort
of heroine one would expect from a novel of the late 1960s, and one can easily
see why the other mistresses would be seduced by her into risking soirées with
sherry, steak, and pop music (all forbidden by the sober, vegetarian,
conservative headmistresses, who fortunately sleep in a different building from
the teachers). Even the teachers who disapprove of her or feel threatened by
her seem unable to resist her. But happily, Vivian is lacking in the angst of,
say, a Doris Lessing heroine.
Vivian has for some time been
the mistress of an oft-married publisher named Garnett Hatfull, whom she
convinces to publish the first novel of one of her fellow teachers, Laura
Lafleur. She also offers Laura advice on dressing and behaving in a more
sophisticated way—though it's an uphill battle. Laura's terribly earnest feelings
about romance, both in her novel and in real life, are hopelessly idealized,
and Garnett agrees to publish her novel because of it naïve, unintentional
comedy. When Laura turns her romantic urges on Garnett, the discord between
fantasy and reality is hilariously clear:
They
were very close together. In her novel, Rosita, the young and innocent heroine,
had imagined that the hero's heavy breathing was because he had run all the way
across the piazza. Laura had herself never heard a man breathing heavily for
any other reason, but she believed she would recognise the phenomenon when it
occurred. Garnett, however, could not be heard breathing at all.
Poor Laura.
The novel is a bit bare bones
in its presentation of the characters. We know very little of Vivian's
background, let alone the other characters. In that sense, it reads a bit like
a play, set always in the immediate present. It's also perhaps a bit jaded for
some readers, though if you're a fan of Barbara Pym, Abercrombie's cynical
humor might be right up your alley. Like Pym, her metaphors are frequently
brilliant, but Abercrombie's are sometimes distinctly more odd. Consider, for
example, this early description of stern Miss Geraldine, one of the
headmistresses:
She
carried with her a menacing serenity. Though almost as tall as her sister she
was less solidly oblong. Her face had the colour and texture of skin, but of
skin that has been removed from the body and scraped on the inside; not
luminous but yet not quite opaque, not dry and yet appearing never to have
needed moisture. She stood with the fingers of one hand loosely entangled in a
long necklet of beads, while the muted hubbub of greeting died away.
There are also some very
funny passages describing the school. Ironically, though Miss Geraldine and, to
a lesser extent, her sister Miss Amanda, have rigid and conservative views of
the behavior of their women staff, they have founded their school on the
standard of total freedom for its girls:
From
sounds that she could hear—a shrieking and a squeaking—she knew that a certain Betty
was swinging on the Lodge gates, smoking a cigarette. The "Suggestions for
Conduct" which were put to the girls, included the thought that it would
be "disturbing to the staff" if the children invaded the Lodge and
its garden; and a particularly gruesome description of lung cancer was read out
several times a term. Ignoring suggestions was as near to breaking rules as
Betty could get (her frantic indiscipline had almost inclined the Miss Gallions
to frame some rules especially for her to break, but this would entail a
sacrifice of the community to the individual and was finally abandoned).
(By the way, I'm always happy
when a book introduces a totally new vocabulary word to me, as happens here
when Vivian, frankly fantasizing about men playing cricket, gives "a
musical but frankly esurient groan.")
I found The Little Difference to be a more or less engrossing read, if for
no other reason than I was constantly curious what the author was going to do
next. There are few enough novels that consistently lead one down unexpected
paths. That said, it does rather seem to just aimlessly amble along without any
definite shape or purpose, and the ending, though appropriate to the tone and
the characters, felt a bit anticlimactic.
Nevertheless, I am certainly
keeping an open mind about Abercrombie, because if nothing else she's a deeply interesting
and unusual author, which counts for a lot with me. I've already made an
interlibrary loan request for another of her novels, so stay tuned for more…
Vivian Mudge, Garnett Hatful, Laura Lafleur..... how could you not want to read about them!!! Thank you for another excellent suggestion for my next read.
ReplyDeleteThanks Ann! Great character names aren't they?
DeleteYes, what character names indeed! Sounds like an interesting one. I need to have a second-hand bookshop delve soon, I feel. Though the TBR exploded somewhat with my recent book token spend-fest ...
ReplyDeleteThanks, Liz. Sorry your comment took so long to appear--Blogger decided not to let me know about new comments...
DeleteIt's hard to believe I'd never heard of Abercrombie, but she's quite an intriguing author. You might enjoy her for comparison with Murdoch, if nothing else. Is that a good excuse for some book shopping???