Friday, February 17, 2017

RUMER GODDEN, China Court (1960) & A Fugue in Time (1945)


Well, it's only February, but I definitely know one book that belongs on this year's Furrowed Middlebrow Dozen. I've been planning for a while to get back to reading Rumer Godden. She has long been one of my favorite authors, but somehow, quite stupidly, I had complacently assumed that I had already read all of her best work—The Greengage Summer, Kingfishers Catch Fire, An Episode of Sparrows, The River, Black Narcissus—amazing and magical books all, and that's not to mention her two riveting memoirs, which I highly recommend.

Somehow I had it in mind that China Court was one of her lesser novels and might prove a disappointment after all of those brilliant books. It wasn't until the seductive new Virago editions became irresistibly cheap at Book Depository (every cloud has a silver lining—buying books from the UK has been cheaper than ever since Brexit weakened the pound…) that I finally gave it a chance. And was completely sucked in and unable to put it down for all of last weekend, then immediately moved on to A Fugue in Time.


Among other things, these two novels reinforced for me just how experimental Rumer Godden manages to be, even while remaining accessible, character-rich, and utterly compelling as a storyteller. Her books might be called Modernist Lite. And the two books do have more in common than the fact that I've read them both in the past week. In many ways, they utilize the same technique—Godden telling the stories of several generations of one family, not chronologically but rather weaving them together, all in the present tense, into one elegant, lovely tapestry. But Fugue seems like an initial attempt to achieve what China Court accomplishes brilliantly, and although Fugue seems to have been popular and well-received when it appeared, I wonder if perhaps Godden was unsatisfied with her initial experiment. Or if she merely felt, fifteen years later, that she knew how to do it more smoothly and successfully. And indeed she did!


The technique is crucial here. When I say that she tells the stories of multiple characters from different generations, all in the present tense and all interspersed together, it sounds like it could be rather chaotic. And indeed, initially there are some startling moments, such as this line from page 5:

The Eagle has flues that Bella cannot wrestle with but Cecily understands it: 'I ought to, I have known it for nearly fifty years,' ever since, at fourteen years old, she comes - 'as kitchen maid then,' says Cecily - from Wales.

Fifty years ago, but "she comes," not "she came." Or this one just one page later:

Though books nowadays are sold with their pages cut, she still keeps a paper knife in the shape of a sword on the table, the hilt damascened in black and gold; John Henry, her husband, gives it to her, long ago in Toledo.

But it's a testament to Godden's skill as a storyteller that these moments serve as cues, and one gets the hang of her technique so quickly that by a few pages later it became—for me at least—second nature, as if I'd been reading novels written this way all my life, with characters who lived at different times both acting in the present tense within the same paragraph, or even in the same sentence. And the effect it all creates—the events in one character's life reflecting off of those in her grandfather's, or the fate of another character lending deeper meaning to a moment in her descendant's childhood—is so intricate and lovely that it practically shimmers.

As much as I love the technique, though, and as astonishing as it is that Godden was able to pull it off so compellingly and even suspensefully, giving us bits and pieces that gradually build until I was practically gasping to see what she could do next, it's really the characters that make the novel so special. Here as elsewhere, Godden's women absolutely step off the page, living and breathing—you can practically feel the draft as they pass you by.


I loved all the characters here, even the ones who were deeply flawed (Godden excels at making one forgive her character's flaws and love them anyway). But one in particular, and indeed one of the most flawed, stood out for me. Eliza, the great-great-aunt of the modern day Tracy, who returns to the house following her grandmother's death, is surely one of the most poignant spinsters anywhere in literature. For her frustrations and anger, which make her undoubtedly difficult to live with (and which lead her eventually to become fabulously dishonest in a way few readers will condemn her for) stem from the stifling limitations she faces as an intelligent woman in a society that has no place for her:

Eliza will not get up because she does not want to get up. 'What is there to get up for?' asks Eliza.

Anne is up early to practise before breakfast. Her piano playing - 'never very good,' says Eliza - is the solitary accomplishment left of all that Eliza and Anne bring back from school where, at Eliza's continual 'worritting' as Polly calls it, they are sent for a year, to be 'finished'. 'Finished, we haven't started yet!' says Eliza.


'We learned some French, which we shall never speak, the use of the globes, for places we shall never see, and we brought it all home in a portmanteau of pride,' says Eliza.

Indeed, her eventual descent into dishonesty (which I won't give away here, as it's so much fun to read about) is a central and far-reaching plot development which will reverberate in the novel's present, with modern day Tracy, seeking her own unlikely happiness at China Court.

In fact, a good many of the women who have lived at China Court have had tragic lives, though this doesn't make the novel ultimately any less uplifting. Somehow, Godden was able to remind me at times both of the Brontës and of William Faulkner (of all things), and yet there's a fundamentally hopeful, compassionate perspective in the novel that's quite diffferent from those darker works.

At any rate, enough said. I loved it. I'm planning to read it again soon. If you haven't read it (or, heaven forbid, if you haven't read anything by Godden yet), then for Pete's sake get a copy and read it.


As I mentioned, from China Court I immediately went on to read the earlier A Fugue in Time, and I also quite enjoyed it. It felt familiar to me after China Court, and the technique and characters are similarly seductive. But for me, there's just no comparison. Fugue has many of the same elements, but the technique seemed to me not nearly so polished. For example, one of the strategies Godden uses here to evoke all the different periods in the house's past is to make lists—lists of sounds the house has heard over the years, of all the types of notes that have been written, of people passing by outside the house, of the various possessions of the house, of holidays celebrated, of births and deaths in the house. Some of these are quite interesting, mind you, but they do rather slow the pace and force you out of the novel's narrative.

There are also vividly portrayed women here, and Selina, neglected daughter and frustrated woman, is a sort of rough draft of Eliza in the later book, and Griselda, who, adapting to managing a house, ordering meals, supervising servants, worries that the house will consume all her life and energy, is a striking character herself.

There is much to like in Fugue, and I suspect that if I had read it first I would have enjoyed it even more. But for me, there's no doubt that China Court is the richer, more lively, and more brilliantly executed novel. As such, I can't recommend it highly enough.

(On the other hand, author Jo Walton wrote in more detail about Fugue here, and it was interesting to read someone's take who clearly loves the earlier book more than the latter.)

17 comments:

  1. I'm usually irritated by books written in the present tense but I love both these. Like you, I prefer China Court (possibly because it's 'easier'?) and have read it several times.

    Would you like a scan of the cover of the first edition of A Fugue in Time? It was one of my lucky finds many years ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would love to see the original cover, Barbara, thanks so much. And lucky you for coming across it!

      Delete
  2. Did you not like In This House of Brede? I notice you don't include it among her best work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wondered that, too, and I loved it (probably influenced by the mid 70's television production With Diana Rigg - but I wondered perhaps if it is outside your time frame?
      Tom

      Delete
    2. Purely an oversight. I had a nagging feeling I had left out one or two other favorites. I do quite like Brede. I didn't know there had been a TV version--I may have to check that out!

      Delete
  3. I'll have to get back to China Court. It's one of the few Goddens I couldn't immediately get into. You didn't mention 'In This House of Brede' in this post, which is my favorite Godden and one of my favorite novels period. I'm not sure if you've written about how you feel about her Catholic and Dance books. So how do you feel?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You might want to give China Court another try, Faith, if you like Godden in general. But of course different books speak to different people, so maybe it's just not your cup of tea. You'll note that two other commenters mentioned Brede as well, so now I feel really bad to have left it off my list. I did love that one as well. Her later novel Five for Sorrow, Ten for Joy felt a little rougher around the edges, so not a favorite, but I still enjoyed it. As for the dance books, I've just moved on to A Candle for St Jude, so we'll see. I know there are other dance-related children's titles (I think), but I haven't read any of those yet. Are you a fan?

      Delete
  4. I love Rumer Godden but haven't read these. I must get back to her soon. (Sorry I lurk rather than comment here as blogspot usually hates me - let's see if this works).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad the comment worked, Ali! Yes, it must have been well over a year since I had read any Godden, and it felt like seeing an old friend again after far too long. She has an entirely unique voice and personality, I think.

      Delete
  5. I loved 'A Fugue in Time' but drifted away from 'China Court'. I suspect it was just the wrong moment because the writing was lovely and I was so pleased that somebody had thought to set a story in Cornwall away from the coast and in china clay country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, you might want give it another try, Jane. As you say, it's funny how much of a difference the right moment can make--I've found books unbearable at one point, only to love them wholeheartedly a few months later.

      Delete
  6. I still haven't read anything by Rumer Godden -- you bloggers are making my TBR list so long! It is both a blessing and a curse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, Karen, you really must give her a try!

      Delete
  7. Every time I read something by Rumer Godden, I wonder why she isn't more widely-known. She's so astonishingly good at weaving a mood and pulling the reader along (Modernist Lite is a great way to describe her style).

    I'd have to say that my favorites by her are "Black Narcissus" and "Kingfishers Catch Fire." Interestingly, I first discovered her as a bookish kid ... I remember loving "Impunity Jane," "The Fairy Doll," and "Miss Happiness and Miss Flower." Wonderful stories.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also grew up with Rumer Godden and always loved her unique prose style. Nobody else wrote like her. _Little Plum_ was my favorite, because of tough, intrepid Belinda.

      Delete
    2. I haven't read any of Godden's children's books yet, but I'm sure I'll get round to sampling them if my current Godden craze keeps up. The other astonishing thing about her is that she wrote so many really memorable books.

      Delete
  8. Modernist lite is just the right description! And there's nothing wrong with that...one doesn't want a heavy meal all the time.

    I finally read Fugue not long ago and was wondering whether China Court would be more satisfying. I need to read it myself and see whether I'll side with you or Jo Walton.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: The comment function on Blogger is notoriously cranky. If you're having problems, try selecting "Name/URL" or "Anonymous" from the "Comment as" drop-down (be sure to "sign" your comment, though, so I know who dropped by). Some people also find it easier using a browser like Firefox or Chrome instead of Internet Explorer.

But it can still be a pain, and if you can't get any of that to work, please email me at furrowed.middlebrow@gmail.com. I do want to hear from you!