Some of you may be familiar with Ruth Adam from her second novel, I'm Not Complaining (1938), which was an early Virago reprint, or from her wonderful historical look at the changing roles of women in A Woman's Place 1910-1975 (1975), available from Persephone. Or you might already have read about two of her more obscure works—the wartime mystery Murder in the Home Guard (1942) and the charming late novel A House in the Country (1957)—on this blog (see here). I find her a consistently interesting author, largely because her work is always informed by a vibrant awareness of social issues, but also because of her attention to detail and to the humorous absurdities of her characters' situations. She doesn't shy away from reality or provide easy answers to her characters' problems, but she also doesn't hesitate to find the humor in them.
As
with most of my authors, little enough information about Adam's lesser-known
fiction is available (and online searches are plagued with irrelevant results
because of the ordinariness of her name—Ruth Adams and Ruth Adamses abound in
staggering numbers). But I've always been struck by ODNB's passing reference to two of her other late novels and their
inspiration:
In 1955 Ruth Adam, with her friend the London county
councillor Peggy Jay, co-founded the Fisher Group, a think-tank on social
policy and the family which gave evidence to government committees of inquiry and
contributed to such legislative reforms as the 1963 and 1969 Children and Young
Persons Acts and the Local Authority Social Service Act of 1970. Arising out of
this concern Ruth Adam wrote her disturbing novels Fetch Her Away (1954) and Look
Who's Talking (1960) about girls in care, which are rare in their
sympathetic depiction of women social workers.
I
was a wee bit ambivalent about these novels, which sounded rather like those
old TV movies-of-the-week that tackled pressing issues of the day (usually in
completely reductive terms). But I knew I could rely on Adam not to be overly
reductive, at least, and probably to make even an issue close to her heart
interesting and entertaining. Fetch Her
Away is hardly a novel I would recommend to everyone, but if you have an
interest in the hardships of neglected children and the workers who
attempt—hope against hope—to help them, then it's quite an interesting
portrayal.
Just FYI, some unavoidable
spoilers here, though I doubt if they would come as a great surprise to anyone
who reads the first 20 pages of the novel.
The
story centers around Suzanne, a young girl whose mother is dead and whose
rather superficial stepmother, as the novel begins, is leaving her abusive
husband and moving on to what she imagines will be greener pastures, and around
Jackie Duffie, a child welfare worker who tries first to reunite the family
with assistance, then to find a suitable foster home for Suzanne, and finally,
as the years pass, to find a home for a pregnant Suzanne and a man she barely
knows.
It's
a bleak story, but a realistic one, which effectively delineates all the forces
that keep the cycle of neglect and despair churning. And sadly, it doesn't seem
as though this cycle has changed very drastically in the intervening 60 years
since the novel was written, though drugs and violence have undoubtedly increased
and further complicated matters. However, although one is likely to feel a bit
sad and thoughtful upon finishing Fetch
Her Away, there are some excellent examples of Adam's charm and humor
scattered here and there throughout, particularly in relation to the workers
and others trying to help Suzanne.
Here,
for example, are Jackie's musings on the perils of temporarily removing
children from troubled homes:
It
was risky to offer to take a child "for a time," because it always
turned out to be a remarkably long time. The working-classes had just
discovered a fact which had been known to the aristocracy for hundreds of
years, and to the middle-classes for a century or so-that family life is a lot
less trouble if you arrange to have your children brought up by paid officials
at a comfortable distance away from home. They looked upon the Children's Department
as a free boarding-school. Once you housed an unwanted child, the parents were
liable to settle down happily without it until it reached years of discretion.
And here we see how
her work deprives her even of the most popular method of fighting insomnia:
Jackie
turned the pillow over a hundred times, in the hope of discovering a
comfortable side to it. She watched the car-lights loom up and recede across
her window, listened to the chanting of late revellers and counted the chimes of the clock. She even descended
to counting sheep jumping through a gap, until she found she was separating
them into possible boarding-out and definitely institutional sheep. Still she
was obstinately wakeful.
And
finally, the passage that most made me laugh, from late in the novel, here's
Jackie seeking help from a powerful and immensely practical community
organizer:
"I know," said Jackie.
"But if no one can do anything, I have an awful feeling that Robert and
Suzanne are doomed to go on repeating the pattern—deserting as they were
deserted, betraying as they were betrayed. It's exactly like one of those old
families which have a curse on them that goes on in each generation and no one
can ever get away from."
Mrs.
Hardy looked doubtful. So far as she had ever thought about family curses, she
had supposed that they could be cleared up by re-housing the family in uncursed
premises and perhaps turning the old place into a youth hostel or even a Child
Guidance Clinic. But she got Jackie's point.
Fetch Her Away is not, then, a
novel that most of you will want to rush out and read for yourselves, but it's
certainly an interesting one in relation to Adam's other work. She was clearly
an author who was passionate about improving the problems she saw around her,
and applied her efforts to entertaining fiction that she must have hoped would
help readers understand them better.
I'm
hoping to also track down Adam's So Sweet
a Changeling, apparently also published in 1954, which one reviewer
described as an "[a]musingly told story of the unauthorised adoption of an
illegitimate baby." And there's one of her novels, 1947's Set to Partners, that seems to be
completely inaccessible, which you know only makes me more intrigued—I don't
even have a clue about its subject matter. (I've been lucky in finding a couple
of her rare early works, though I've been grossly remiss about writing about
them here—mea culpa and hopefully I can rectify that at some point.)
'Set to Partners' sounds like an instruction from an English Country Dance! Idly wondering if this means that Ruth Adams was a folk dancer, whether the book involves folk dancers, or if it is just that the term was in common parlance in the early 1950s even though nowadays it is part of a specialised vocabulary ...
ReplyDeleteThere's nothing in what biographical material I have that mentions country dance, but Adam had such a fascinating and varied life I wouldn't be surprised if there was some connection. She is certainly a candidate for a riveting biography!
DeleteIs House in the country anywhere on the horizon for you and DSP?
ReplyDeleteThat novel (as well as perhaps others by Ruth Adam) is certainly on my radar, Sue, but I admit we've been so focused on the first two batches of titles that we haven't had a chance to do more than fantasize about a third batch. Fingers crossed that we can get to it down the road!
DeleteI enjoyed the bits of humor you pointed out in this story. I think humor elevates any story, no matter the subject matter.
ReplyDeleteCould I ask an unrelated question? I'm the reader who was so crazy about Margaret Kennedy's "The Feast." My mother had a copy of Kennedy's "Lucy Carmichael," so I borrowed it. I read about 60 pages but found it so insipid that I quit. Have you read it?
Thanks, Lucy. Adam's is certainly an interesting perspective to share when reading her novels.
DeleteI actually haven't read Lucy Carmichael yet. I have to admit I picked it up a couple of times and tried to make a start, but got easily distracted. I believe a fellow blogger (I can't remember which right now) wrote enthusiastically about it a while back though, so maybe it gets better?
I really enjoyed 'I'm Not Complaining' so much that I coughed up for a copy of 'There Needs No Ghost." I haven't read it yet, though. Saving for a rainy day.
ReplyDeleteI'm looking forward to reading that one too, Lisa. A slightly condescending review from Queenie Leavis only made me more enthusiastic!
DeleteThis is the description of Set To Partners from the jacket flap:
ReplyDeleteMiss Adam's new book is a significant comment on the generation which reached its majority in the 1920s, and whose offspring were called upon to justify their own and their parents' existence in the war of 1939-45.
It is a moving story by an experienced author who knows how to construct a human and poignant drama, The contrasted lives of the feckless, wanton mother and the stoical, courageous daughter are set down with clarity and insight, and offer a seacrching observation on the values of life.
Miss Adams has humour and an eye for quick detail. her reconstruction of small-town society in the 1920s makes an entertaining and shrewdly delineated background to the story.