I
added Elaine Howis to my Overwhelming List a few months ago, and mentioned her
in a post in September, noting that reviews of her small and concentrated
literary output (four short novels and one story collection, all in the course
of five years when she was in her late fifties, after which she fell silent for
the remaining four decades of her impressive century-plus life span) suggested
an affinity with Virginia Woolf. A couple of weeks ago, I spontaneously made an
interlibrary loan request for this, her second novel (don't ask why I started
with the second—I have no idea).
As
soon as I picked the book up from the library, I fell in love with it. By which
I mean that, for better or worse, I fell in love with the book itself—the
cutest, loveliest book you could ever imagine. Beautiful blue covers, a compact
size, large reader-friendly text—all of which predisposed me in the book's
favor. It was published by J. M. Dent, and it's an adorable, fetishizable
volume (those of you who don't care how a book looks and feels in your
hands—could there be such readers?—please skim ahead a bit), and one that
seemed to be in the same condition, after nearly 60 years in a library, as it
must have been fresh off a bookstore shelf in 1957. In fact, it made me lapse
into quite a little revery about how much my feelings about a given book might
be impacted by the quality of the book itself—the physical object, its design, and
the work that went into it, quite apart from the work of the author. I have
always known myself to have a tendency to judge a book by its cover, but this
book brought me to new levels.
I was so infatuated that I have to include here a
color scan of two sample pages (from very early in the novel, so no spoilers)
and a pic of the book posed seductively on our coffee table—where, indeed, it
rather looks like it should take up permanent residency.
Moving
on to the actual content of the book,
the plot revolves around a handful of residents of a precarious cliffside above
a small English village, and their tense interactions with one another. There
is Shale, a widow whose husband was found, not too long ago, dead at the bottom
of a cliff, and who spends much of her time sitting in her secret garden
staring into her unkempt lily pond. There's Ronald, who has carefully studied
the art of being a gentleman (including surrepticiously acquiring the complete
works of Beatrix Potter after they're mentioned in passing one day as part of a
shared upper-class culture), and whose determination to make even his private
behaviors correspond to his views of gentility may be represented in the book
by the sterile order of his house:
Ronald
pulled the curtains forward with a little feminine flourish. He realised he was
becoming pernickety, and did not mind. Observing so much, he saw that men
living alone usually fell into one of two extremes. Either they dug, at will,
the sardines out of their native tin-or they decanted them into a silver dish.
Ronald decanted them into a silver dish.
There's
Lionel and Laura Blair, a married couple who have lived now for years at the
local inn. Though purportedly they are searching for a house, in fact they are
unable to commit and are content to take over the Smugglers' Tavern, gradually
infiltrating it with their own décor. And making occasional brief but
meaningful appearances are the tavern's widowed owner, Mrs. Galloway, who keeps
her distance from the residents and feels distinctly superior to her current
position in life, and Daisy Bell, the barmaid, who proceeds through life with
the simplest possible concepts of life and relationships, her mantra being to
"jolly the gentlemen along."
And
then there's Gemmi, a young woman delighting in living alone for the first
time, who has recently taken over her cousin Isabella's house and who—perhaps
fatefully—decides to investigate her Isabella's sudden decision to leave the
village, which might have to do with the suspicion that she stole Shale's
diamond ring during a party (and with the fact that Shale's recently-deceased husband
may have been enamored of her). This decision forms the backdrop of the
neighbors' relations, a sort of mystery that—while first seeming too trivial
to sustain a novel—gradually leads to other, deeper and more disturbing
revelations.
There's an almost fable-like simplicity to Howis's
setting—three houses perched precariously on the side of a cliff and isolated
from any other villagers. And if the final revelation is perhaps not entirely convincing and just a bit too
melodramatic, it's the quality of fable that saves it. Fables don't have to be
realistic in the way that other kinds of stories do. They only have to make
sense within the odd world a storyteller has created, and The Lily Pond does that quite well.
Howis possesses a subtle, slightly edgy humor that I
very much enjoyed. Here is one of my favorite passages, about the tavern owner
who feels she deserves better:
Mrs
Galloway stood near the door. Her posture was time honoured. So had stood that
innumerable band of women forced by circumstances into positions other than the
ones they considered life owed them. Governesses, and third cousins of dukes,
and impoverished widows of great men, and parsons' daughters. One pities them.
One also pities, perhaps, their employers.
And here, Daisy's lack of experience with men is made
funny with the addition of one prefix in the last line:
Daisy
Bell had a deep knowledge of men, but no interpretation of that knowledge.
Irony was not in her. She had heard those words many, many times; from tall men
and short men, from fat men and thin men, and men with red faces, and men with
grey faces, and men with moustaches, and men without moustaches; and every time
she heard them her heart welled up in sympathy and misunderstanding and spilled
over.
Ah, to have a listener to one's moanings whose heart
wells up in sympathy and misunderstanding!
One of the things Howis does brilliantly, too, is
metaphor. She is lavish with metaphors,
sometimes quite elaborate ones, and I found myself trying to memorize some of
them for later recollection in appropriate situations (most being too extended
to be practical for actually repeating in real life scenarios). Here's one of
my favorites, again about Ronald:
The
second thing that worried him was Gemmi's insistence on knowing why her cousin
Isabella wished to leave Weymon Cove. Ask Laura, he had said. If Gemmi had been less obstinate he would not have
been forced to say it. He did not want to throw Isabella or Laura to the
wolves. No one could say he was a man who did not scruple to throw his friends to
the wolves. He did scruple. (But in the end he threw them, and the wolves
devoured them.) He was a kind man if he was only given a chance; and sometimes
he was given it and sometimes he was not. He was like a shipwrecked mariner
adrift on an open raft. If there
was enough room for himself, enough food, enough water, he would save those
poor drowning bodies, listen to their beseeching cries. But if there was
not-what could he do? He had no choice. Sail on. Sail on.
All in all, The
Lily Pond is a charmingly elegant book, the kind one feels one should be
reading in a cozy modern chair by a window overlooking dramatic scenery—or at
the very least in a sophisticated cafe. In some ways, it feels like the perfect
middlebrow novel—secrets,
sophisticated intellectual characters, a touch of melodrama, and just enough
opacity in its elegant, seductive prose to make it feel quite literary, almost
experimental or modernist, but not so difficult or inaccessible as the really
high-brow fiction of its day.
On
the other hand, I wonder if it might have rather more depth than at first
appears. (Anita Brookner's recent obituary—sad news, though Brookner started
writing too late to be included in my list—cited a comment of Hilary Mantel's
to the effect that Brookner was "the sort of artist described as minor by people who read her books only
once." Is Howis also that sort of artist, I wonder?) I was interested by
the fact that, while the novel does evoke Woolf—perhaps especially in the
central symbol of Shale's lily pond, which occupies a central, almost mystical
position in the book that's not unlike that of Woolf's lighthouse—it also felt
peculiarly modern to me, almost like something that could occupy a bookstore
shelf next to Shirley Hazzard or Michael Ondaatje. At any rate, I think many of
you, especially fans of Pamela Frankau, for instance, or the better-known
Elizabeth Taylor or Elizabeth Bowen, or even the aforementioned Woolf, might
quite like Howis.
What I am stunned about is, your coffee table looks so nice and tidy - I am not nearly the book maniac you are, but mine is always littered with piles of TBR's..............and on a bookish note, I have rered some of Brookner's titles over the years, so there to them!
ReplyDeleteTom
Well, there is that entire bookcase of TBRs in the bedroom... :-)
DeleteI do find that the edition, condition, appearance of a book can have an impact on my enjoyment of a book. Now, don't get me wrong, I have been known to read paperbacks that have lost all their binding and I am reading one page at a time, (each page is loose and I hole one page, read it then move to the other pile of loose pages) and enjoyed the story. But I do very much enjoy a nice condition old book, creamy paper, large easy to read font, boards in good condition, perhaps with gold lettering or other embossing. And lovely dust jackets (or nice paperback cover art.) Although, I prefer to read a hardback with the DJ off. When reading my own books, I remove the DJ and put it in a safe place till I have finished reading it, then put the book back in the DJ. My particular pet dislike in "dead tree" books is the library re-bound that is so tight that I have to struggle to read the words close to the binding. However, the words ARE the most important thing, and I will struggle with yellowed pages, tiny print, poorly bound books, books in pieces, etc. if the words are satisfying enough.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as I age and my eyes get worse, I do find eBooks with adjustable fonts to be more and more appealing at times. There are times when I struggle to read even the loveliest of real books, and then I am glad to have a variety of eBooks available.
Another thing that doesn't bother me too much is typos. (or "scan-o's"). I find intentional "editing" of original text to bring things in line with modern tastes or "US" vs. country of origin standards very frustrating. But with most typo type errors, I can figure out what was intended and I laugh/sign/or even cuss a bit and just keep on reading.
This does appear to be a lovely book, and the DJ is appealing also. The page submitted piques my interest.
Jerri
One thing that has always depressed me (though now age may contribute to the problem) is small print and/or extra-large pages. I have a whole stack of Rue Morgue Press books that I have a resistance to reading because the layout is so dreary. I have to admit that typos do bug me--not just one or two, but if there's clearly been sloppy editing, that is irritating for me.
Delete