Ah,
I've been awaiting the opportunity to use that title again. If I remember
correctly, I've only used the "buried treasure" title once before,
when I first came across the wonderful Elizabeth
Fair (now almost three years ago—yikes!), who I later had the delightful
experience of publishing as a Furrowed Middlebrow title from Dean Street Press.
Since then, I've come across some wonderful books and authors, but no author
whose work was quite forgotten enough to be called "buried" and yet
consistently excellent enough to be "treasure."
It's
extraordinarily odd that Doris Langley Moore should fit both of those
categories. She is certainly not forgotten in herself, and is in fact
remembered for several impressive reasons, probably most notably as one of the
first serious historians of fashion—see her books The Woman in Fashion (1949) and The
Child in Fashion (1953), among others—and the person responsible for the
establishment of the Fashion Museum located in the Assembly Rooms in Bath (we
walked by it on our way to see the restored Assembly Rooms where Jane Austen
once danced, and now I could kick myself for not having visited the museum
itself). She also occasionally worked as a costume designer for film and
theatre, including designing Katharine Hepburn's dresses for The African Queen (1951)—see here
for Hepburn's praise of her work.
 |
| Doris Langley Moore |
But
that's only the beginning. Moore was an important Byron scholar, and was the
first non-family member to work with a large collection of Byron-related papers
owned by Byron's great-granddaughter. The first of her Byron-related books, The Late Lord Byron (1961), focuses
unconventionally on the dramas and revelations of the years immediately
following his death, and has recently been reprinted by Neversink Press. (It's
also available in the U.S. as a free download from Hathi Trust.) Lord Byron, Accounts Rendered (1974) examined
the revelations that could be gleaned about Byron's life by closely examining
his finances. And Ada, Countess of
Lovelace (1977) is a biography of Byron's daughter. As you'll see below,
Moore also utilized her knowledge of Byron in her final novel, My Caravaggio Style (1959), which deals
with a forgery of Byron's famously destroyed memoirs (and even, amusingly,
features Moore herself as a character when a team of Byron experts gather late
in the novel to confer on the memoirs).
Then
there is the fact that Moore was the first biographer of E. Nesbit (1933,
expanded edition 1966), and her book, containing many interviews with family
members and other contemporaries, has been heavily relied on by subsequent
scholars. There's another acclaimed bio, Marie
& the Duke of H: The Daydream Love Affair of Marie Bashkirtseff (1966).
And there's several witty self-help and other non-fiction books as well,
including The Technique of the Love
Affair (1928), The Pleasure of Your
Company: A Text-book of Hospitality (1933, written with her sister June
Langley Moore), Our Loving Duty, or, The
Young Housewife's Compendium (1936, also with June), The Vulgar Heart: An Enquiry into the Sentimental Tendencies of Public
Opinion (1945), and Pleasure: A
Discursive Guide Book (1953)
Phew!
It's exhausting just listing all of her achievements. But my favorite part: her
ODNB entry quietly notes that
"she had no formal education."
On
top of that, however, she published six novels, four of which are now among my
favorites of the year (for that matter, perhaps my favorites of several years).
When
I first added Moore to my list of authors, I flagged her fifth novel, All Done by Kindness (1951), which was described
by a bookseller as "a civilized novel about some fabulous art treasures
from an old attic." I didn't know anything more about it than that, but
when I started all my recent frenzy of interlibrary loan requests, I saw it
staring up at me from my TBR list. And virtually as soon as I had it in my hot
little hands, I knew, first, that I had to correct her entry on my list (I had
her down as having written five novels instead of six, because her first, A Winter's Passion (1932), has virtually
ceased to exist), and, second, that I'd found a new kindred spirit in the
literary universe.
Set
just after the end of World War II in the town of Charlton Wells, Kindness begins with Dr George
Sandilands visiting his elderly patient Mrs Hovenden, quietly decaying in her
venerable old house. Money is tight for this last of her line, and she has been
attempting to sell various pieces of old-fashioned furnishings, artworks, and
jewelry, none of them fashionable or valued by a postwar market obsessed by the
new and clean and modern. She's finding it impossible to keep a housekeeper and
has been left unattended again, barely managing to care for herself. Out of
compassion and generosity (the kindness of the title), Dr Sandilands offers to
provide her with funds which will allow her to find a live-in married couple to
help her. She agrees, but only on condition that he must take something from
her possessions in return. She mentions a few remaining trunks full of
belongings handed down for generations:
"We had such large trousseaux in those days, more than we
needed of everything. Then, there's all kinds of needlework and lace, and a few
clothes it might be worth while to make over. The old materials were not like
the rubbish you get today." She paused again and fished up, as it were, more
of these long-submerged treasures. "There are one or two very pretty
counterpanes, and my mother's best parasol with an ivory handle-a beauty. And
you'll find some of my husband's things—though I don't suppose they'll be much
use, the cassocks and surplices. The cloth is good, of course. And there are
some embroidered waistcoats that must have belonged to his father. They are
very old. A museum might be glad of them."
Dr
Sandilands tries to beg off, imagining the useless piles of outdated clothing,
and the horror of his stern housekeeping daughter Beatrix. Then:
"There are some pictures too," Mrs. Hovenden brought
out with a fresh effort, "oil paintings that were in the rector's family."
And
thus begins an elegant comedy of errors that will rock the art world. The story
twists and turns like a middlebrow Da
Vinci Code, but with far more subtlety, wit, and insight into characters
both noble and corrupt, and far less violence (scheming and deceiving and
maneuvering are so much more interesting than gunfire and explosions). It's a
masterpiece of tight plotting and unexpected machinations.
We
meet Dr Sandilands' daughters, the rather imperious Beatrix, who has no
patience with old beat-up artworks, and young Linda, who works at the Public Library
and is fully prepared to get swept up in the romance of a stash of old
treasures. Then there's Stephanie du Plessis, Linda's superior at the Public
Library, an amateur art connoisseur recently returned from living in Rhodesia,
who develops a theory about the artworks and clings to it like a dog with a
bone; Sir Harry Maximer, esteemed author of books on Italian art (though
perhaps not quite the expert he is made out to be), who isn't above a bit of
shady dealing to build his own jealously-guarded collection; Sir Harry's
patient and competent secretary Mrs Rose, whose personal feelings about him complicate
matters considerably; young Arnold Bayley, director of the small local
Elderfield Art Gallery, who throws his hat into the ring by helping Mrs du Plessis;
E. Quiller, a sleazy London junk shop dealer; and Morris, the owner of the
local antique shop (or junk shop, depending on who you ask).
This
is one of those wonderful books where you don't want to put it down for
multiple reasons—first, because you can't begin to predict what will happen and
can't wait to find out, and second, because the characters are either so
likeable or so delectably unlikeable
that you can't wait to see them get their just deserts. It was absolutely
marvelous fun, and I knew I was hooked. I put in an interlibrary loan request
for My Caravaggio Style (the only
other easily obtainable Moore novel) before I was a quarter of the way through.
At
the beginning of Caravaggio, Moore's
sixth and final novel, a young bookseller and author, Quentin Williams, finds
himself perversely trying to impress an American dealer interested in
manuscripts, and ends by hinting that he just might have a copy of Lord Byron's
long-destroyed memoirs. This is partly because the American is irritatingly smug
(aren't we though?!), and perhaps also partly because Williams has just
received the biannual royalties from the two biographies he's published, equalling
a grand total of just over 4 pounds. He puts the American off temporarily by
inventing an elaborate tale about the manuscript's location in a relative's
attic in Wales, and then begins to formulate his plans.
Oh,
yes, and his motives for this deception are also undoubtedly linked to his need
to impress his girlfriend, a smart, beautiful model whose decision to pair up
with Quentin is something neither the reader nor Quentin himself are able to
quite comprehend. And her intelligence, as Quentin manages to accidentally
pique her interest in Byron, becomes only one of Quentin's problems.
The
title, by the way (a slightly confusing one for a book about Byron forgeries),
comes from Byron's own description of the style of her later memoirs.
Apparently, the earlier portions of his memoirs were rather tame, and shied
away from the more scandalous elements of his life. But later on he returned to
writing his memoirs and turned up the heat, and Quentin quite sensibly decides
that his part of the lost memoirs will come from these later sections:
"My finest, ferocious Caravaggio style"—that was his
own phrase for his later manner; and that was the style I was aiming at, an
interplay of light and shadow that would rivet the attention and, ultimately,
draw the eye to darkness.
Here,
as in Kindness, the unforeseen
complications and complexities form the main portion of the entertaining plot.
One of the refreshing things about Moore's work is that, in those novels I've
read so far at least, she rarely exerts much energy with humdrum love affairs
or traditional plots ending in marriage. Her main characters are far more infatuated
with paintings, porcelains, and manuscripts than they are with other humans.
There are few enough authors who can make middlebrow pageturners out of
highbrow passions, but Moore certainly does it.
That
said, of these two novels, Kindness
remains my favorite as it has the more complex and deeply satisfying plot. But
if Caravaggio is the only Moore you
can get your hands on, by all means do so.
Next
time, working rather strangely backwards in Moore's ouevre, I'm planning to
write about her fourth novel, Not at Home
(1948), and her third, A Game of Snakes
and Ladders (original published as They
Knew Her When: A Game of Snakes and Ladders in 1938, slightly revised and
retitled edition 1955). Neither were quite so easy to track down and therefore
I didn't have them in hand until I'd finished the last two. (And her first two
novels, A Winter's Passion and The Unknown Eros, have proven even more
challenging.).
